{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2000-0445 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2000-0445 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2000-0445 is a low-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 13 Oct 2000."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2000-0445 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2000-0445 is a low-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 13 Oct 2000. \nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2000-0445 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2000-0445/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2000-0445/index.md)","id":"CVE-2000-0445","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2000-0445/index.md","name":"CVE-2000-0445","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-r4m8-4q3x-xfcc"],"analysis":{"component_type":"desktop_application","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["data_read","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"unknown","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"PGP encryption tool","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Insufficient randomness in PGP key generation allows attackers to predict keys, compromising encrypted data confidentiality.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"weak_cryptography"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"pgp","vendor":"pgp"}],"cvss":{"score":2.1,"severity":"low","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[],"description":"The pgpk command in PGP 5.x on Unix systems uses an insufficiently random data source for non-interactive key pair generation, which may produce predictable keys.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Weak cryptography in n/a","id":"CVE-2000-0445","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"weak_cryptography","year":"2000"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":4,"next":{"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2000-0446"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2000-0444"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2000-10-13","related":[{"cvss_score":5,"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2000-0678","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2000-10-13"},{"cvss_score":4.6,"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2001-0435","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2001-05-24"},{"cvss_score":2.1,"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2002-1977","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2005-06-28"},{"cvss_score":2.1,"headline":"Path traversal in n/a","id":"CVE-2001-0265","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2002-03-09"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-08","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Insufficient randomness in PGP key generation allows attackers to predict keys, compromising encrypted data confidentiality.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2000-0445/"}