# CVE-2001-1004: Cross-site scripting in n/a

> Remote attackers can execute arbitrary script on gnut Gnutella clients by sharing files with malicious names, requiring user interaction to view the file.

- **Severity:** Medium 5.0 (`AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Not needed
- **Attackable:** Over the internet
- **Victim action needed:** A user has to click or open something
- **Fix available:** No
- **Published:** 2 Feb 2002
- **Updated:** 8 Aug 2024
- **Also known as:** GHSA-f2qm-7522-xqhj

## What is CVE-2001-1004?

CVE-2001-1004 is a medium-severity cross-site scripting vulnerability in n/a, published on 2 Feb 2002. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link.

### Official description

Cross-site scripting (CSS) vulnerability in gnut Gnutella client before 0.4.27 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary script on other clients by sharing a file whose name contains the script tags.

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2001-1004?

It affects 1 product.


Products: Gnutella Gnutella Client.

## How do I fix CVE-2001-1004?

No fix has been published for CVE-2001-1004 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.

## Is CVE-2001-1004 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2001-1004 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2001-1004 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2001-1004 is a medium-severity cross-site scripting vulnerability in n/a, published on 2 Feb 2002. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2001-1004 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2001-1004/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2001-1004/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2001-1004
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2001-1004
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2001-1004

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2001-1004/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.