{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2001-1477 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2001-1477 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2001-1477 is a medium-severity missing authorization vulnerability in n/a, published on 10 May 2005. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2001-1477 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2001-1477 is a medium-severity missing authorization vulnerability in n/a, published on 10 May 2005. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2001-1477 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2001-1477/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2001-1477/index.md)","id":"CVE-2001-1477","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2001-1477/index.md","name":"CVE-2001-1477","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-rv43-4wxw-597g"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["data_read","data_modify"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"BEA Tuxedo middleware","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Attackers can bypass ACLs to access remote domain services in BEA Tuxedo, leading to unauthorized data access or modification.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"missing_authorization"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"tuxedo","vendor":"bea"}],"cvss":{"score":4.6,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[],"description":"The Domain gateway in BEA Tuxedo 7.1 does not perform authorization checks for imported services and qspaces on remote domains, even when an ACL exists, which allows users to access services in a remote domain.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Missing authorization in n/a","id":"CVE-2001-1477","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"missing_authorization","year":"2001"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":2,"next":{"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2001-1478"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"SSH before 2.0, with RC4 encryption and the \"disallow NULL passwords\" option enabled, makes it easier for remote attackers to guess portions","id":"CVE-2001-1476"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2005-05-10","related":[{"cvss_score":6.8,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2007-5576","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2007-10-18"},{"cvss_score":5,"headline":"Path traversal in n/a","id":"CVE-2003-0621","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2003-11-05"},{"cvss_score":5,"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2003-0622","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2003-11-05"},{"cvss_score":4.3,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in n/a","id":"CVE-2003-0623","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2003-11-05"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-08","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Attackers can bypass ACLs to access remote domain services in BEA Tuxedo, leading to unauthorized data access or modification.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2001-1477/"}