{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2001-1499 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2001-1499 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2001-1499 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 21 Jun 2005. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2001-1499 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2001-1499 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 21 Jun 2005. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2001-1499 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2001-1499/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2001-1499/index.md)","id":"CVE-2001-1499","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2001-1499/index.md","name":"CVE-2001-1499","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-939j-m4fh-6c8j"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"no_fix_stated","impacts":["data_read","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"VPN server software","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Remote attackers can distinguish valid from invalid users via distinct error messages, facilitating brute force attacks against Check Point VPN-1.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"information_disclosure"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"vpn-1","vendor":"checkpoint"}],"cvss":{"score":5,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[],"description":"Check Point VPN-1 4.1SP4 using SecuRemote returns different error messages for valid and invalid users, with prompts that vary depending on the authentication method being used, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct brute force attacks.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2001-1499","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"information_disclosure","year":"2001"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":5,"next":{"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2001-1500"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2001-1498"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2005-06-21","related":[{"cvss_score":7.2,"headline":"Privilege escalation in n/a","id":"CVE-2006-0255","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2006-01-18"},{"cvss_score":5,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2008-5849","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2009-01-06"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-08","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote attackers can distinguish valid from invalid users via distinct error messages, facilitating brute force attacks against Check Point VPN-1.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2001-1499/"}