# CVE-2002-0218: Code injection in n/a

> Local attackers can execute arbitrary code via format string vulnerabilities in SAS/Base and SAS/Integration Technologies command line arguments.

- **Severity:** High 7.2 (`AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** No
- **Published:** 3 May 2002
- **Updated:** 8 Aug 2024
- **Also known as:** GHSA-pc5x-4ff4-7hrv

## What is CVE-2002-0218?

CVE-2002-0218 is a high-severity code injection vulnerability in n/a, published on 3 May 2002. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

Format string vulnerability in (1) sastcpd in SAS/Base 8.0 and 8.1 or (2) objspawn in SAS/Integration Technologies 8.0 and 8.1 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via format specifiers in a command line argument.

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2002-0218?

It affects 2 products.


Products: Sas Sas Base, Sas Sas Integration Technologies.

## How do I fix CVE-2002-0218?

No fix has been published for CVE-2002-0218 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.

## Is CVE-2002-0218 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2002-0218 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Other vulnerabilities in n/a

- [CVE-2002-0219](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2002-0219/): Memory corruption in n/a (high 7.2)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2002-0218 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2002-0218 is a high-severity code injection vulnerability in n/a, published on 3 May 2002. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2002-0218 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2002-0218/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2002-0218/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2002-0218
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-0218
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2002-0218

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2002-0218/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.