# CVE-2003-0655: Privilege escalation in n/a

> Local attackers can overwrite arbitrary files and gain root privileges by exploiting a race condition in the rscsi utility of cdrtools.

- **Severity:** High 7.2 (`AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** No
- **Published:** 5 Aug 2003
- **Updated:** 8 Aug 2024
- **Also known as:** GHSA-v4rf-j2qg-h4c6

## What is CVE-2003-0655?

CVE-2003-0655 is a high-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 5 Aug 2003. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

rscsi in cdrtools 2.01 and earlier allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files and gain root privileges by specifying the target file as a command line argument, which is modified while rscsi is running with privileges.

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2003-0655?

It affects 1 product.


Products: Cdrtools Cdrtools.

## How do I fix CVE-2003-0655?

No fix has been published for CVE-2003-0655 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.

## Is CVE-2003-0655 being exploited?

It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2003-0655 exists.

Public exploit code:

- CDRTools 2.0 - RSCSI Debug File Arbitrary Local File Manipulation (exploitdb)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2003-0655 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2003-0655 is a high-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 5 Aug 2003. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2003-0655 exists.

Affected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2003-0655/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2003-0655/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2003-0655
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-0655
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2003-0655

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2003-0655/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.