{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2005-0408 exists.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2005-0408 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2005-0408 is a critical vulnerability in n/a, published on 16 Feb 2005. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2005-0408 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2005-0408 is a critical vulnerability in n/a, published on 16 Feb 2005. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2005-0408 exists.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2005-0408/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2005-0408/index.md)","id":"CVE-2005-0408","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2005-0408/index.md","name":"CVE-2005-0408","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-6vj4-7pwq-5wq3"],"analysis":{"component_type":"web_application","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["security_bypass","privilege_escalation"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"CitrusDB web application","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Remote attackers can bypass authentication and gain privileges by predicting MD5 hashes using a hard-coded string in CitrusDB.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"hardcoded_credentials"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"citrusdb","vendor":"citrusdb"}],"cvss":{"score":9.8,"severity":"critical","source":"nvd","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-916","name":"Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort"}],"description":"CitrusDB 0.3.6 and earlier generates easily predictable MD5 hashes of the user name for the id_hash cookie, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and gain privileges by calculating the MD5 checksum of the user name combined with the \"boogaadeeboo\" string, which is hard-coded in the $hidden_hash variable.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":1,"first_seen":"2004-02-15","github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[{"date":"2004-02-15","kind":"exploitdb","ref":"25102","stars":null,"title":"CitrusDB 0.3.6 - Remote Authentication Bypass"}],"tier":"weaponised"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Hardcoded credentials in n/a","id":"CVE-2005-0408","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"hardcoded_credentials","year":"2005"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":2,"next":{"headline":"Missing authorization in n/a","id":"CVE-2005-0409"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Cross-site scripting in n/a","id":"CVE-2005-0407"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2005-02-16","related":[{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Path traversal in n/a","id":"CVE-2005-0411","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2005-02-16"},{"cvss_score":6.4,"headline":"Missing authorization in n/a","id":"CVE-2005-0409","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2005-02-16"},{"cvss_score":5,"headline":"SQL injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2005-0410","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2005-02-16"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"GPL-2.0-or-later","name":"Exploit-DB"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-07","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote attackers can bypass authentication and gain privileges by predicting MD5 hashes using a hard-coded string in CitrusDB.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2005-0408/"}