{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2005-0431 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2005-0431 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2005-0431 is a high-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 15 Feb 2005. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2005-0431 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2005-0431 is a high-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 15 Feb 2005. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2005-0431 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2005-0431/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2005-0431/index.md)","id":"CVE-2005-0431","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2005-0431/index.md","name":"CVE-2005-0431","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-x5xg-pc53-g48q"],"analysis":{"component_type":"network_device","fix_type":"configuration_change","impacts":["other"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":true,"product_category":"Spam Firewall","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Attackers can abuse white-listed domains to use the firewall as an open mail relay for spam due to missing domain restrictions.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"misconfiguration"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"barracuda_spam_firewall","vendor":"barracuda_networks"}],"cvss":{"score":7.5,"severity":"high","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[],"description":"Barracuda Spam Firewall 3.1.10 and earlier does not restrict the domains that white-listed domains can send mail to, which allows members of white-listed domains to use Barracuda as an open mail relay for spam.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Misconfiguration in n/a","id":"CVE-2005-0431","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"misconfiguration","year":"2005"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":3,"next":{"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2005-0432"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2005-0430"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2005-02-15","related":[{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Command injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2006-4081","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2006-08-11"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Hardcoded credentials in n/a","id":"CVE-2006-4001","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2006-08-05"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Command injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2005-2847","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2005-09-08"},{"cvss_score":7.2,"headline":"Hardcoded credentials in n/a","id":"CVE-2006-4082","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2006-08-11"},{"cvss_score":6.5,"headline":"SQL injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2008-1094","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2008-12-19"},{"cvss_score":6.4,"headline":"Command injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2005-2849","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2005-09-08"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-07","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Attackers can abuse white-listed domains to use the firewall as an open mail relay for spam due to missing domain restrictions.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2005-0431/"}