# CVE-2005-3150: Code injection in n/a

> Remote FTP servers can execute arbitrary code on Weex clients via format string vulnerabilities in filenames.

- **Severity:** High 7.5 (`AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Not needed
- **Attackable:** Over the internet
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 5 Oct 2005
- **Updated:** 7 Aug 2024
- **Also known as:** CVE-2005-3117, DEBIAN-CVE-2005-3150, DSA-855-1, GHSA-2994-xw3p-6772

## What is CVE-2005-3150?

CVE-2005-3150 is a high-severity code injection vulnerability in n/a, published on 5 Oct 2005. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

Format string vulnerability in the Log_Flush function in Weex 2.6.1.5, 2.6.1, and possibly other versions allows remote FTP servers to execute arbitrary code via format strings in filenames.

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2005-3150?

It affects 1 product.


Products: Weex Weex.

## How do I fix CVE-2005-3150?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2005-3150 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2005-3150 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2005-3150 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2005-3150 is a high-severity code injection vulnerability in n/a, published on 5 Oct 2005. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2005-3150 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2005-3150/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2005-3150/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2005-3150
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-3150
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2005-3150

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2005-3150/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.