# CVE-2005-4249: Information disclosure in n/a

> Remote attackers can obtain user credentials by accessing plaintext files in the forum directory due to insufficient access controls.

- **Severity:** Medium 5.0 (`AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Not needed
- **Attackable:** Over the internet
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** No
- **Published:** 15 Dec 2005
- **Updated:** 7 Aug 2024
- **Also known as:** GHSA-6jr2-9mj6-xwqc

## What is CVE-2005-4249?

CVE-2005-4249 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 15 Dec 2005. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

ADP Forum 2.0 through 2.0.3 stores sensitive information in plaintext files under the web document root with insufficient access control, which allows remote attackers to obtain user credentials via requests to the forum/users directory.

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2005-4249?

It affects 1 product.


Products: Adp Adp Forum.

## How do I fix CVE-2005-4249?

No fix has been published for CVE-2005-4249 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.

## Is CVE-2005-4249 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2005-4249 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Other vulnerabilities in n/a

- [CVE-2006-1157](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2006-1157/): Cross-site scripting in n/a (medium 4.3)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2005-4249 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2005-4249 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 15 Dec 2005. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2005-4249 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2005-4249/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2005-4249/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2005-4249
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-4249
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2005-4249

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2005-4249/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.