# CVE-2006-2036: Weak cryptography in n/a

> Attackers can decrypt protected email attachments by entering only a repeated substring of the password, bypassing encryption.

- **Severity:** Low 2.1 (`AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Not needed
- **Attackable:** Not stated
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** No
- **Published:** 26 Apr 2006
- **Updated:** 7 Aug 2024
- **Also known as:** GHSA-2cq9-f7wp-92xf

## What is CVE-2006-2036?

CVE-2006-2036 is a low-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 26 Apr 2006. 

### Official description

iOpus Secure Email Attachments (SEA), probably 1.0, does not properly handle passwords that consist of repetitions of a substring, which allows attackers to decrypt files by entering only the substring.

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2006-2036?

It affects 1 product.


Products: Iopus Secure Email Attachments.

## How do I fix CVE-2006-2036?

No fix has been published for CVE-2006-2036 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.

## Is CVE-2006-2036 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2006-2036 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2006-2036 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2006-2036 is a low-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 26 Apr 2006. 
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2006-2036 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2006-2036/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2006-2036/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2006-2036
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-2036
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2006-2036

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2006-2036/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
