{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2006-3595 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2006-3595 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2006-3595 is a high-severity missing authorization vulnerability in n/a, published on 14 Jul 2006. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2006-3595 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2006-3595 is a high-severity missing authorization vulnerability in n/a, published on 14 Jul 2006. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2006-3595 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2006-3595/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2006-3595/index.md)","id":"CVE-2006-3595","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2006-3595/index.md","name":"CVE-2006-3595","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-63x6-9wjm-8hc2"],"analysis":{"component_type":"network_device","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["privilege_escalation","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Cisco Router Web Setup","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Remote attackers can access the Cisco Router Web Setup server with arbitrary privileges due to missing authentication in the default configuration.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"missing_authorization"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"router_web_setup","vendor":"cisco"}],"cvss":{"score":7.5,"severity":"high","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[],"description":"The default configuration of IOS HTTP server in Cisco Router Web Setup (CRWS) before 3.3.0 build 31 does not require credentials, which allows remote attackers to access the server with arbitrary privilege levels, aka bug CSCsa78190.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Missing authorization in n/a","id":"CVE-2006-3595","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"missing_authorization","year":"2006"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":9,"next":{"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2006-3596"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2006-3594"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2006-07-14","related":[],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-07","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote attackers can access the Cisco Router Web Setup server with arbitrary privileges due to missing authentication in the default configuration.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2006-3595/"}