# CVE-2006-3734: Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the Command Line Interface (CLI) for Cisco Security Monitoring, Analysis and Response System (CS-MAR


- **Severity:** High 7.2 (`AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Fix available:** No
- **Published:** 19 Jul 2006
- **Updated:** 7 Aug 2024
- **Also known as:** GHSA-22cf-8wqp-mvp7

## What is CVE-2006-3734?

CVE-2006-3734 is a high-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 19 Jul 2006. 

### Official description

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the Command Line Interface (CLI) for Cisco Security Monitoring, Analysis and Response System (CS-MARS) before 4.2.1, allow local CS-MARS administrators to execute arbitrary commands as root.

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2006-3734?

It affects 1 product.


Products: Cisco Cs-Mars.

## How do I fix CVE-2006-3734?

No fix has been published for CVE-2006-3734 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.

## Is CVE-2006-3734 being exploited?

It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2006-3734 exists.

Public exploit code:

- Cisco/Protego CS-MARS < 4.2.1 - 'JBoss' Remote Code Execution (exploitdb)

## Other vulnerabilities in n/a

- [CVE-2006-0181](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2006-0181/): Hardcoded credentials in n/a (high 7.2)
- [CVE-2006-3732](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2006-3732/): Hardcoded credentials in n/a (medium 5.0)
- [CVE-2009-2977](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2009-2977/): Information disclosure in n/a (low 3.3)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2006-3734 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2006-3734 is a high-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 19 Jul 2006. 
Exploitation: It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2006-3734 exists.

Affected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2006-3734/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2006-3734/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2006-3734
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-3734
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2006-3734

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2006-3734/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.