{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2006-6682 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2006-6682 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2006-6682 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 21 Dec 2006. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2006-6682 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2006-6682 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 21 Dec 2006. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2006-6682 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2006-6682/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2006-6682/index.md)","id":"CVE-2006-6682","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2006-6682/index.md","name":"CVE-2006-6682","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-4jqc-fv67-wvvf"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"no_fix_stated","impacts":["data_read"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Authentication utility","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Remote attackers can enumerate valid usernames by observing distinct error messages for valid versus invalid login attempts.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"information_disclosure"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"chetcpasswd","vendor":"chetcpasswd_project"}],"cvss":{"score":5,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-388","name":null}],"description":"Pedro Lineu Orso chetcpasswd 2.3.3 provides a different error message when a request with a valid username fails, compared to a request with an invalid username, which allows remote attackers to determine valid usernames on the system.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2006-6682","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"information_disclosure","year":"2006"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":6,"next":{"headline":"Auth bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2006-6683"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2006-6681"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2006-12-21","related":[{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Auth bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2006-6679","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2006-12-21"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-07","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote attackers can enumerate valid usernames by observing distinct error messages for valid versus invalid login attempts.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2006-6682/"}