{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2007-0068 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2007-0068 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2007-0068 is a critical vulnerability in Ibm Lotus Domino, published on 6 Jun 2007. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2007-0068 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2007-0068 is a critical vulnerability in Ibm Lotus Domino, published on 6 Jun 2007. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2007-0068 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Ibm Lotus Domino. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2007-0068/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2007-0068/index.md)","id":"CVE-2007-0068","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2007-0068/index.md","name":"CVE-2007-0068","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-cwww-r96m-r246"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["privilege_escalation"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"IBM Lotus Domino","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Remote authenticated users can gain privileges by modifying signed scheduled agents because the signature is not revalidated.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"security_feature_bypass"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"lotus_domino","vendor":"ibm"}],"cvss":{"score":9.3,"severity":"critical","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[],"description":"IBM Lotus Domino 7.0.x before 7.0.3 does not revalidate the signature on a signed scheduled agent after the agent is modified, which allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges via a modified agent in a server database.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2007-0068","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":"ibm:lotus_domino","products":["ibm:lotus_domino"],"type":"security_feature_bypass","year":"2007"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":6,"next":{"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2007-0069"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2007-0067"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2007-06-06","related":[{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Auth bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-1519","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2011-03-25"},{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-0913","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2011-02-08"},{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Integer overflow in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-0914","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2011-02-08"},{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-0915","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2011-02-08"},{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-0916","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2011-02-08"},{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-0917","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2011-02-08"},{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-0918","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2011-02-08"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-07","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote authenticated users can gain privileges by modifying signed scheduled agents because the signature is not revalidated.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2007-0068/"}