{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 2 products.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2007-6094 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2007-6094 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2007-6094 is a medium-severity denial of service vulnerability in n/a, published on 22 Nov 2007. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2007-6094 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2007-6094 is a medium-severity denial of service vulnerability in n/a, published on 22 Nov 2007. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2007-6094 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2007-6094/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2007-6094/index.md)","id":"CVE-2007-6094","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2007-6094/index.md","name":"CVE-2007-6094","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-3cr8-8gxj-qjhf"],"analysis":{"component_type":"network_device","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["denial_of_service"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Ingate Firewall","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Remote attackers can crash the IPsec module in Ingate Firewall and SIParator by sending a specific IPsec Phase 2 proposal lacking Perfect Forward Secrecy.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"denial_of_service"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"ingate_firewall","vendor":"ingate"},{"product":"ingate_siparator","vendor":"ingate"}],"cvss":{"score":4.3,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-20","name":"Improper Input Validation"}],"description":"The IPsec module in the VPN component in Ingate Firewall before 4.6.0 and SIParator before 4.6.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (module crash) via an IPsec Phase 2 proposal that lacks Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS).","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2007-6094","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"denial_of_service","year":"2007"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":4,"next":{"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2007-6095"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2007-6093"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2007-11-22","related":[{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2007-6092","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2007-11-22"},{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Other in n/a","id":"CVE-2007-6097","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2007-11-22"},{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2007-6099","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2007-11-22"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2007-6098","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2007-11-22"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2003-1112","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2005-03-11"},{"cvss_score":7.1,"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2007-6093","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2007-11-22"},{"cvss_score":5,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2007-6096","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2007-11-22"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-07","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote attackers can crash the IPsec module in Ingate Firewall and SIParator by sending a specific IPsec Phase 2 proposal lacking Perfect Forward Secrecy.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2007-6094/"}