{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 2 products.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2009-1160 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2009-1160 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2009-1160 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 9 Apr 2009. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2009-1160 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2009-1160 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 9 Apr 2009. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2009-1160 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2009-1160/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2009-1160/index.md)","id":"CVE-2009-1160","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2009-1160/index.md","name":"CVE-2009-1160","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-rrxx-7pc4-7jx7"],"analysis":{"component_type":"network_device","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Cisco ASA firewall","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Remote attackers can bypass intended access restrictions on Cisco ASA and PIX firewalls due to improper implementation of the implicit deny statement.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"security_feature_bypass"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"cisco","cpe":[{"product":"adaptive_security_appliance_5500","vendor":"cisco"},{"product":"pix","vendor":"cisco"}],"cvss":{"score":4.3,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-264","name":null}],"description":"Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) 5500 Series and PIX Security Appliances 7.0 before 7.0(8)1, 7.1 before 7.1(2)74, 7.2 before 7.2(4)9, and 8.0 before 8.0(4)5 do not properly implement the implicit deny statement, which might allow remote attackers to successfully send packets that bypass intended access restrictions, aka Bug ID CSCsq91277.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2009-1160","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"security_feature_bypass","year":"2009"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":5,"next":{"headline":"Path traversal in n/a","id":"CVE-2009-1161"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2009-1159"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2009-04-09","related":[{"cvss_score":7.8,"headline":"Auth bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2009-1155","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2009-04-09"},{"cvss_score":7.8,"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2009-1157","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2009-04-09"},{"cvss_score":7.8,"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2009-1158","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2009-04-09"},{"cvss_score":7.8,"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2009-1159","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2009-04-09"},{"cvss_score":7.8,"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2008-2732","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2008-09-04"},{"cvss_score":7.1,"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2008-2733","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2008-09-04"},{"cvss_score":7.1,"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2008-2734","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2008-09-04"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-07","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote attackers can bypass intended access restrictions on Cisco ASA and PIX firewalls due to improper implementation of the implicit deny statement.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2009-1160/"}