# CVE-2009-2293: Auth bypass in n/a

> Remote attackers can bypass authentication and gain administrative access by manipulating the usernamed cookie parameter.

- **Severity:** High 7.5 (`AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Not needed
- **Attackable:** Over the internet
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** No
- **Published:** 1 Jul 2009
- **Updated:** 7 Aug 2024
- **Also known as:** GHSA-2xq8-5hcx-pxxh

## What is CVE-2009-2293?

CVE-2009-2293 is a high-severity authentication bypass vulnerability in n/a, published on 1 Jul 2009. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

Optimum Web Design Tutorial Share 3.5.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and obtain administrative access by setting the usernamed cookie parameter.

Weakness: CWE-264

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2009-2293?

It affects 1 product.


Products: Tutorial-Share Tutorial Share.

## How do I fix CVE-2009-2293?

No fix has been published for CVE-2009-2293 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.

## Is CVE-2009-2293 being exploited?

It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2009-2293 exists.

Public exploit code:

- Tutorial Share 3.5.0 - Insecure Cookie Handling (exploitdb)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2009-2293 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2009-2293 is a high-severity authentication bypass vulnerability in n/a, published on 1 Jul 2009. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2009-2293 exists.

Affected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2009-2293/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2009-2293/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-2293
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-2293
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2009-2293

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2009-2293/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.