{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2009-5008 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2009-5008 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2009-5008 is a low-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 12 Oct 2010. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2009-5008 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2009-5008 is a low-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 12 Oct 2010. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2009-5008 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2009-5008/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2009-5008/index.md)","id":"CVE-2009-5008","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2009-5008/index.md","name":"CVE-2009-5008","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-9g9x-24rg-f99h"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"adjacent_or_local","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Cisco Secure Desktop","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Local attackers can bypass Cisco Secure Desktop policy restrictions by modifying executable files, undermining security controls.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"security_feature_bypass"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"secure_desktop","vendor":"cisco"}],"cvss":{"score":2.1,"severity":"low","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-264","name":null}],"description":"Cisco Secure Desktop (CSD), when used in conjunction with an AnyConnect SSL VPN server, does not properly perform verification, which allows local users to bypass intended policy restrictions via a modified executable file.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2009-5008","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"security_feature_bypass","year":"2009"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":1,"next":{"headline":"Use after free in n/a","id":"CVE-2009-5009"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Path traversal in n/a","id":"CVE-2009-5007"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2010-10-12","related":[{"cvss_score":9.3,"headline":"Command injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2015-0691","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2015-04-17"},{"cvss_score":9.3,"headline":"Code injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2012-4655","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2012-09-24"},{"cvss_score":9.3,"headline":"Code injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-0925","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2011-02-28"},{"cvss_score":9.3,"headline":"Code injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-0926","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2011-02-25"},{"cvss_score":9.3,"headline":"Code injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-0589","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2010-04-15"},{"cvss_score":5.5,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2006-5393","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2006-10-18"},{"cvss_score":4.6,"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2006-5807","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2006-11-08"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-09-16","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Local attackers can bypass Cisco Secure Desktop policy restrictions by modifying executable files, undermining security controls.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2009-5008/"}