{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2010-0595 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2010-0595 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2010-0595 is a critical vulnerability in n/a, published on 27 May 2010. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2010-0595 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2010-0595 is a critical vulnerability in n/a, published on 27 May 2010. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2010-0595 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-0595/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-0595/index.md)","id":"CVE-2010-0595","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-0595/index.md","name":"CVE-2010-0595","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-9ghx-rj25-wxc9"],"analysis":{"component_type":"network_device","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["privilege_escalation","account_takeover"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Cisco Mediator Framework","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Remote attackers can gain privileged access to Cisco Mediator devices using default administrative passwords, requiring immediate credential changes or firmware upgrades.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"hardcoded_credentials"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"cisco","cpe":[{"product":"mediator_framework","vendor":"cisco"}],"cvss":{"score":10,"severity":"critical","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-255","name":null}],"description":"Cisco Mediator Framework 1.5.1 before 1.5.1.build.14-eng, 2.2 before 2.2.1.dev.1, and 3.0 before 3.0.9.release.1 on the Cisco Network Building Mediator NBM-2400 and NBM-4800 and the Richards-Zeta Mediator 2500 has a default password for the administrative user account and unspecified other accounts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain privileged access, aka Bug ID CSCtb83495.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Hardcoded credentials in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-0595","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"hardcoded_credentials","year":"2010"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":7,"next":{"headline":"Missing authorization in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-0596"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Cross-site scripting in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-0594"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2010-05-27","related":[{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-0600","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2010-05-27"},{"cvss_score":9.3,"headline":"Weak cryptography in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-0598","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2010-05-27"},{"cvss_score":9.3,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-0599","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2010-05-27"},{"cvss_score":9,"headline":"Missing authorization in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-0596","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2010-05-27"},{"cvss_score":9,"headline":"Missing authorization in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-0597","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2010-05-27"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-07","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote attackers can gain privileged access to Cisco Mediator devices using default administrative passwords, requiring immediate credential changes or firmware upgrades.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-0595/"}