{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2010-2278 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2010-2278 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2010-2278 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 14 Jun 2010. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2010-2278 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2010-2278 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 14 Jun 2010. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2010-2278 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-2278/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-2278/index.md)","id":"CVE-2010-2278","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-2278/index.md","name":"CVE-2010-2278","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-rjj8-xw42-4pvx"],"analysis":{"component_type":"web_application","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["data_read","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":true,"product_category":"IBM Lotus Connections","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Attackers can bypass SSL enforcement in bookmarklet pop-ups to intercept cleartext data or perform man-in-the-middle attacks.","user_interaction":"required","vuln_class":"security_feature_bypass"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"lotus_connections","vendor":"ibm"}],"cvss":{"score":4,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[],"description":"The bookmarklet pop-up in the Bookmarks component in IBM Lotus Connections 2.5.x before 2.5.0.2 does not properly follow the \"force SSL\" setting, which might make it easier for remote attackers to obtain the cleartext of network communication by sniffing the network, or spoof arbitrary servers via a man-in-the-middle attack.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-2278","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"security_feature_bypass","year":"2010"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":9,"next":{"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-2279"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Cross-site scripting in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-2277"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2010-06-14","related":[{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the Profiles search pages in IBM Lotus Connections 2.x before 2.0.1 have unknown impact and attack v","id":"CVE-2008-4809","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2008-10-31"},{"cvss_score":7.6,"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-2279","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2010-06-14"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"SQL injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2008-4806","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2008-10-31"},{"cvss_score":6.8,"headline":"Missing authorization in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-1032","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2011-02-14"},{"cvss_score":5,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2008-4808","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2008-10-31"},{"cvss_score":4.3,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-0503","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2013-04-23"},{"cvss_score":4.3,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-1030","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2011-02-14"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-09-16","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Attackers can bypass SSL enforcement in bookmarklet pop-ups to intercept cleartext data or perform man-in-the-middle attacks.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-2278/"}