{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 2 products.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2010-3869 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Apply the vendor's patch.","what":"CVE-2010-3869 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 17 Nov 2010. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2010-3869 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2010-3869 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 17 Nov 2010. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2010-3869 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-3869/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-3869/index.md)","id":"CVE-2010-3869","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-3869/index.md","name":"CVE-2010-3869","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-5f9q-v927-crw8"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["data_modify","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Certificate Authority","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Authenticated users can generate unlimited certificates by replaying a single SCEP one-time PIN, bypassing issuance limits.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"business_logic"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"redhat","cpe":[{"product":"certificate_system","vendor":"redhat"},{"product":"dogtag_certificate_system","vendor":"redhat"}],"cvss":{"score":4,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-310","name":null}],"description":"Red Hat Certificate System (RHCS) 7.3 and 8 and Dogtag Certificate System allow remote authenticated users to generate an arbitrary number of certificates by replaying a single SCEP one-time PIN.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Business logic in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-3869","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"business_logic","year":"2010"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":7,"next":{"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-3870"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Missing authorization in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-3868"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2010-11-17","related":[{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Other in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-1886","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2014-01-24"},{"cvss_score":6.5,"headline":"Missing authorization in n/a","id":"CVE-2009-0588","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2009-05-27"},{"cvss_score":5.8,"headline":"Missing authorization in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-3868","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2010-11-17"},{"cvss_score":5.5,"headline":"Missing authorization in n/a","id":"CVE-2012-3367","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2012-08-13"},{"cvss_score":4.3,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-1885","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2014-01-24"},{"cvss_score":4.3,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in n/a","id":"CVE-2012-4543","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2013-01-04"},{"cvss_score":4.3,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in n/a","id":"CVE-2012-2662","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2012-08-13"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-07","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Authenticated users can generate unlimited certificates by replaying a single SCEP one-time PIN, bypassing issuance limits.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-3869/"}