{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2010-3901 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade to a fixed version.","what":"CVE-2010-3901 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 12 Oct 2010. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2010-3901 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2010-3901 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 12 Oct 2010. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2010-3901 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-3901/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-3901/index.md)","id":"CVE-2010-3901","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-3901/index.md","name":"CVE-2010-3901","record":{"aliases":["DEBIAN-CVE-2010-3901","GHSA-92px-2chv-hqhf"],"analysis":{"component_type":"desktop_application","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"OpenConnect VPN client","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Man-in-the-middle attackers can spoof AnyConnect SSL VPN servers due to improper X.509 certificate validation in OpenConnect.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"security_feature_bypass"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"openconnect","vendor":"infradead"}],"cvss":{"score":6.4,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-20","name":"Improper Input Validation"}],"description":"OpenConnect before 2.25 does not properly validate X.509 certificates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary AnyConnect SSL VPN servers via a crafted server certificate that (1) does not correspond to the server hostname or (2) is presented in circumstances involving a missing --cafile configuration option.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-3901","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"security_feature_bypass","year":"2010"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":3,"next":{"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-3902"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-3900"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2010-10-12","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-7098","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-02-13"},{"cvss_score":7.8,"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2012-3291","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2012-06-07"},{"cvss_score":5.9,"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2020-12105","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-04-23"},{"cvss_score":5,"headline":"Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in http.c in OpenConnect before 4.08 allow remote VPN gateways to cause a denial of service (applicati","id":"CVE-2012-6128","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2013-02-24"},{"cvss_score":5,"headline":"Use after free in n/a","id":"CVE-2009-5009","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2010-10-12"},{"cvss_score":5,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-3902","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2010-10-12"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-09-16","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Man-in-the-middle attackers can spoof AnyConnect SSL VPN servers due to improper X.509 certificate validation in OpenConnect.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-3901/"}