{"answers":{"affected":"5 open source packages ship an affected version, including django and Django. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2010-4535 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade django to a fixed version for your release line: 1.1.3 or 1.2.4.","what":"CVE-2010-4535 is a medium-severity denial of service vulnerability in Djangoproject Django, published on 10 Jan 2011. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2010-4535 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2010-4535 is a medium-severity denial of service vulnerability in Djangoproject Django, published on 10 Jan 2011. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2010-4535 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- django (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 1.1.3, 1.2.4\n- django (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 1.1.3\n- django (PyPI): affected from 1.2; fixed in 1.2.4\n- Django (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 1.1.3\n- Django (PyPI): affected from 1.2; fixed in 1.2.4\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-4535/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-4535/index.md)","id":"CVE-2010-4535","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-4535/index.md","name":"CVE-2010-4535","record":{"aliases":["DEBIAN-CVE-2010-4535","GHSA-7wph-fc4w-wqp2","PYSEC-2011-9"],"analysis":{"component_type":"web_application","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["denial_of_service"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Django web framework","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Remote attackers can cause denial of service in Django applications by sending URLs with excessively large base36 integers during password reset requests.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"denial_of_service"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"redhat","cpe":[{"product":"django","vendor":"djangoproject"}],"cvss":{"score":5,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-20","name":"Improper Input Validation"}],"description":"The password reset functionality in django.contrib.auth in Django before 1.1.3, 1.2.x before 1.2.4, and 1.3.x before 1.3 beta 1 does not validate the length of a string representing a base36 timestamp, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via a URL that specifies a large base36 integer.","ecosystems":["PyPI"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Improper date handling in Django","id":"CVE-2010-4535","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"PyPI","product":"djangoproject:django","products":["djangoproject:django"],"type":"denial_of_service","year":"2010"},"n_packages":5,"n_references":14,"next":{"headline":"Cross-site scripting in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-4536"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["1.1.3"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"Django","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-7wph-fc4w-wqp2"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["1.2.4"],"introduced":["1.2"],"last_affected":[],"package":"Django","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-7wph-fc4w-wqp2"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["1.1.3","1.2.4"],"introduced":["0","1.2"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:pypi/django","source":"PYSEC-2011-9"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["1.1.3"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:pypi/django","source":"GHSA-7wph-fc4w-wqp2"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["1.2.4"],"introduced":["1.2"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:pypi/django","source":"GHSA-7wph-fc4w-wqp2"}],"prev":{"headline":"Improper query string handling in Django","id":"CVE-2010-4534"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2011-01-10","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Privilege abuse in GenericInlineModelAdmin","id":"CVE-2026-4277","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-04-07"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django SQL injection in HasKey(lhs, rhs) on Oracle","id":"CVE-2024-53908","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-12-06"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django SQL injection vulnerability","id":"CVE-2024-42005","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-08-07"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django bypasses validation when using one form field to upload multiple files","id":"CVE-2023-31047","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-05-07"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django `Trunc()` and `Extract()` database functions vulnerable to SQL Injection","id":"CVE-2022-34265","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-07-04"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"SQL Injection in Django","id":"CVE-2021-35042","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-07-02"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"SQL injection in Django","id":"CVE-2020-7471","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-02-03"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"PyPA Advisory Database","prefix":"PYSEC"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-07","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote attackers can cause denial of service in Django applications by sending URLs with excessively large base36 integers during password reset requests.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2010-4535/"}