{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 2 products.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2011-0532 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Apply the vendor's patch.","what":"CVE-2011-0532 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 23 Feb 2011. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2011-0532 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2011-0532 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 23 Feb 2011. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2011-0532 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2011-0532/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2011-0532/index.md)","id":"CVE-2011-0532","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2011-0532/index.md","name":"CVE-2011-0532","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-pw8c-3x98-r358"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["privilege_escalation"],"network_reachable":"adjacent_or_local","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"389 Directory Server","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Local attackers can gain privileges by placing a malicious shared library in the current working directory due to insecure LD_LIBRARY_PATH settings in 389 Directory Server scripts.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"privilege_escalation"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"redhat","cpe":[{"product":"389_directory_server","vendor":"fedoraproject"},{"product":"directory_server","vendor":"redhat"}],"cvss":{"score":6.2,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-264","name":null}],"description":"The (1) backup and restore scripts, (2) main initialization script, and (3) ldap-agent script in 389 Directory Server 1.2.x (aka Red Hat Directory Server 8.2.x) place a zero-length directory name in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH, which allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse shared library in the current working directory.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Privilege escalation in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-0532","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"privilege_escalation","year":"2011"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":5,"next":{"headline":"Apache Continuum and Archiva vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting","id":"CVE-2011-0533"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-0531"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2011-02-23","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Information disclosure in 389-ds-base","id":"CVE-2017-7551","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-08-16"},{"cvss_score":8.1,"headline":"Auth bypass in 389-ds-base","id":"CVE-2017-15135","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-01-24"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Denial of service in 389-ds-base","id":"CVE-2019-10171","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2019-08-02"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Denial of service in 389-ds-base","id":"CVE-2018-14638","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-09-14"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Denial of service in 389-ds-base","id":"CVE-2018-1054","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-03-07"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Memory corruption in 389-ds-base","id":"CVE-2017-15134","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-03-01"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-0741","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-04-19"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Local attackers can gain privileges by placing a malicious shared library in the current working directory due to insecure LD_LIBRARY_PATH settings in 389 Directory Server scripts.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2011-0532/"}