{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2011-0926 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2011-0926 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2011-0926 is a critical code injection vulnerability in n/a, published on 25 Feb 2011. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2011-0926 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2011-0926 is a critical code injection vulnerability in n/a, published on 25 Feb 2011. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2011-0926 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2011-0926/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2011-0926/index.md)","id":"CVE-2011-0926","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2011-0926/index.md","name":"CVE-2011-0926","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-2gxw-4wp7-72hf"],"analysis":{"component_type":"desktop_application","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["code_execution"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Cisco Secure Desktop","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Remote attackers can execute arbitrary code by spoofing the Cisco Secure Desktop installation process via a vulnerable ActiveX control.","user_interaction":"required","vuln_class":"code_injection"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"cisco","cpe":[{"product":"secure_desktop","vendor":"cisco"}],"cvss":{"score":9.3,"severity":"critical","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-20","name":"Improper Input Validation"}],"description":"A certain ActiveX control in CSDWebInstaller.ocx in Cisco Secure Desktop (CSD) does not properly verify the signature of an unspecified downloaded program, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by spoofing the CSD installation process, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0589.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Code injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-0926","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"code_injection","year":"2011"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":7,"next":{"headline":"Auth bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-0935"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Code injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-0925"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2011-02-25","related":[{"cvss_score":9.3,"headline":"Command injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2015-0691","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2015-04-17"},{"cvss_score":9.3,"headline":"Code injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2012-4655","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2012-09-24"},{"cvss_score":9.3,"headline":"Code injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-0925","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2011-02-28"},{"cvss_score":9.3,"headline":"Code injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-0589","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2010-04-15"},{"cvss_score":5.5,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2006-5393","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2006-10-18"},{"cvss_score":4.6,"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2006-5807","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2006-11-08"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote attackers can execute arbitrary code by spoofing the Cisco Secure Desktop installation process via a vulnerable ActiveX control.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2011-0926/"}