{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2012-4846 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2012-4846 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2012-4846 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Ibm Lotus Notes, published on 19 Dec 2012. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2012-4846 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2012-4846 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Ibm Lotus Notes, published on 19 Dec 2012. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2012-4846 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Ibm Lotus Notes. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2012-4846/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2012-4846/index.md)","id":"CVE-2012-4846","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2012-4846/index.md","name":"CVE-2012-4846","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-g39h-q25h-8r2q"],"analysis":{"component_type":"desktop_application","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["data_read"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"IBM Lotus Notes","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Remote attackers can steal sensitive session cookies via script access because the HTTPOnly flag is missing, requiring user interaction to exploit.","user_interaction":"required","vuln_class":"information_disclosure"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"ibm","cpe":[{"product":"lotus_notes","vendor":"ibm"}],"cvss":{"score":4.3,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-200","name":"Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor"}],"description":"IBM Lotus Notes 8.5.x before 8.5.3 FP3 does not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header for a web-application cookie, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information via script access to this cookie, aka SPRs JMAS7TRNLN and SRAO8U3Q68.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2012-4846","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":"ibm:lotus_notes","products":["ibm:lotus_notes"],"type":"information_disclosure","year":"2012"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":3,"next":{"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2012-4847"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Privilege escalation in n/a","id":"CVE-2012-4845"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2012-12-19","related":[{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-1608","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2010-04-29"},{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Integer overflow in n/a","id":"CVE-2009-3032","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2010-03-05"},{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Other in n/a","id":"CVE-2004-2281","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2005-07-19"},{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Command injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2004-0480","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2004-06-30"},{"cvss_score":9.3,"headline":"Code injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2012-2174","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2012-06-20"},{"cvss_score":9.3,"headline":"Integer overflow in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-1213","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2011-05-31"},{"cvss_score":9.3,"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-1214","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2011-05-31"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote attackers can steal sensitive session cookies via script access because the HTTPOnly flag is missing, requiring user interaction to exploit.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2012-4846/"}