{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 29 products.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2012-4948 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2012-4948 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2012-4948 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 14 Nov 2012. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2012-4948 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2012-4948 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 14 Nov 2012. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2012-4948 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2012-4948/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2012-4948/index.md)","id":"CVE-2012-4948","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2012-4948/index.md","name":"CVE-2012-4948","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-p5m6-f3fp-3v88"],"analysis":{"component_type":"network_device","fix_type":"configuration_change","impacts":["security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Fortinet UTM appliance","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Man-in-the-middle attackers can spoof SSL servers because Fortinet UTM appliances share default CA certificates and private keys across installations.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"weak_cryptography"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"certcc","cpe":[{"product":"fortigate-1000c","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-100d","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-110c","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-1240b","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-200b","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-20c","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-300c","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-3040b","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-310b","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-311b","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-3140b","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-3240c","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-3810a","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-3950b","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-40c","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-5001a-sw","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-5001b","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-5020","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-5060","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-50b","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-5101c","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-5140b","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-600c","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-60c","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-620b","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-800c","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-80c","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigate-voice-80c","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortigaterugged-100c","vendor":"fortinet"}],"cvss":{"score":5.3,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:A/AC:H/Au:N/C:C/I:P/A:N","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-295","name":"Improper Certificate Validation"}],"description":"The default configuration of Fortinet Fortigate UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Fortinet_CA_SSLProxy certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Weak cryptography in n/a","id":"CVE-2012-4948","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"weak_cryptography","year":"2012"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":3,"next":{"headline":"SQL injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2012-4949"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Hardcoded credentials in n/a","id":"CVE-2012-4947"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2012-11-14","related":[{"cvss_score":5.1,"headline":"Cross-site request forgery in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-1414","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2013-07-08"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Man-in-the-middle attackers can spoof SSL servers because Fortinet UTM appliances share default CA certificates and private keys across installations.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2012-4948/"}