{"answers":{"affected":"","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2013-1622 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2013-1622 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2013-1622 is a vulnerability, published on 8 Feb 2013."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2013-1622 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2013-1622 is a vulnerability, published on 8 Feb 2013. \nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2013-1622 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-1622/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-1622/index.md)","id":"CVE-2013-1622","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-1622/index.md","name":"CVE-2013-1622","record":{"aliases":[],"analysis":null,"analysis_generated_by":null,"assigner":"mitre","cpe":[],"cvss":{"score":null,"severity":null,"source":null,"vector":null,"version":null},"cwes":[],"description":"DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: none.  Reason: This candidate is not a security issue.  Further investigation showed that, because of RFC noncompliance, no version or configuration of the product had the vulnerability previously associated with this ID. Notes: none","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.","id":"CVE-2013-1622","indexable":false,"kev":null,"kind":"cve_rejected","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":null,"year":"2013"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":0,"next":{"headline":"The TLS and DTLS implementations in wolfSSL CyaSSL before 2.5.0 do not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a noncompliant MAC c","id":"CVE-2013-1623"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-1621"},"products":[],"published":"2013-02-08","related":[],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"REJECTED","updated":"2013-02-13","vendors":[]},"summary":null,"url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-1622/"}