{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2013-2073 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade to a fixed version.","what":"CVE-2013-2073 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 2 May 2014. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2013-2073 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2013-2073 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 2 May 2014. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2013-2073 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-2073/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-2073/index.md)","id":"CVE-2013-2073","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-2073/index.md","name":"CVE-2013-2073","record":{"aliases":["DEBIAN-CVE-2013-2073","GHSA-7m2p-hrg9-pw87"],"analysis":{"component_type":"developer_tool","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["security_bypass","data_read"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Transifex CLI client","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Man-in-the-middle attackers can spoof Transifex servers because the CLI client fails to validate X.509 certificates, compromising data integrity and confidentiality.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"security_feature_bypass"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"redhat","cpe":[{"product":"transifex","vendor":"transifex"}],"cvss":{"score":4.3,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-20","name":"Improper Input Validation"}],"description":"Transifex command-line client before 0.9 does not validate X.509 certificates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof a Transifex server via an arbitrary certificate.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-2073","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"security_feature_bypass","year":"2013"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":3,"next":{"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-2074"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-2072"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2014-05-02","related":[{"cvss_score":4.3,"headline":"Transifex command-line client has improper certificate validation","id":"CVE-2013-7110","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2014-05-02"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Man-in-the-middle attackers can spoof Transifex servers because the CLI client fails to validate X.509 certificates, compromising data integrity and confidentiality.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-2073/"}