{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2013-4869 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2013-4869 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2013-4869 is a vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Manager, published on 18 Jul 2013. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2013-4869 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2013-4869 is a vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Manager, published on 18 Jul 2013. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2013-4869 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Cisco Unified Communications Manager. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-4869/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-4869/index.md)","id":"CVE-2013-4869","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-4869/index.md","name":"CVE-2013-4869","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-563c-77qf-c6mg"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"configuration_change","impacts":["security_bypass","data_read"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Cisco Unified Communications","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Attackers can bypass cryptographic protections in Cisco Unified Communications Manager using a shared static encryption key to access sensitive data.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"hardcoded_credentials"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"unified_communications_manager","vendor":"cisco"}],"cvss":{"score":0,"severity":"low","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:N","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-522","name":"Insufficiently Protected Credentials"}],"description":"Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) 7.1(x) through 9.1(2) and the IM \u0026 Presence Service in Cisco Unified Presence Server through 9.1(2) use the same CTI and database-encryption key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of this key, aka Bug IDs CSCsc69187 and CSCui01756.  NOTE: the vendor has provided a statement that the \"hard-coded static encryption key is considered a hardening issue rather than a vulnerability, and as such, has a CVSS score of 0/0.\"","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Hardcoded credentials in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-4869","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":"cisco:unified_communications_manager","products":["cisco:unified_communications_manager"],"type":"hardcoded_credentials","year":"2013"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":2,"next":{"headline":"SQL injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-4870"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-4868"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2013-07-18","related":[{"cvss_score":8.6,"headline":"Cisco Unified Communications Manager Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)","id":"CVE-2026-20230","kev_date_added":"2026-06-25","published":"2026-06-03"},{"cvss_score":8.2,"headline":"Cisco Unified Communications Products Code Injection","id":"CVE-2026-20045","kev_date_added":"2026-01-21","published":"2026-01-21"},{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Cisco Unified Communications Manager Static SSH Credentials Vulnerability","id":"CVE-2025-20309","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-07-02"},{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-1643","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2011-08-29"},{"cvss_score":9.9,"headline":"Deserialization in Cisco Packaged Contact Center Enterprise","id":"CVE-2024-20253","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-01-26"},{"cvss_score":9,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2009-0632","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2009-03-12"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"SQL injection in Cisco Unified Communications Manager","id":"CVE-2017-6757","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-08-07"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Attackers can bypass cryptographic protections in Cisco Unified Communications Manager using a shared static encryption key to access sensitive data.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-4869/"}