{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2013-6695 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2013-6695 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2013-6695 is a medium-severity missing authorization vulnerability in n/a, published on 2 Dec 2013. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2013-6695 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2013-6695 is a medium-severity missing authorization vulnerability in n/a, published on 2 Dec 2013. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2013-6695 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-6695/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-6695/index.md)","id":"CVE-2013-6695","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-6695/index.md","name":"CVE-2013-6695","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-7977-cpc9-f879"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["data_read"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Cisco Secure ACS","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Remote authenticated users can bypass RBAC checks to download support bundles and access sensitive user database information.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"missing_authorization"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"cisco","cpe":[{"product":"secure_access_control_system","vendor":"cisco"}],"cvss":{"score":4,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-264","name":null}],"description":"The RBAC implementation in Cisco Secure Access Control System (ACS) does not properly verify privileges for support-bundle downloads, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via a download action, as demonstrated by obtaining read access to the user database, aka Bug ID CSCuj39274.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Missing authorization in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-6695","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"missing_authorization","year":"2013"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":1,"next":{"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-6696"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-6694"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2013-12-02","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Cisco Secure Access Control System Java Deserialization","id":"CVE-2018-0147","kev_date_added":"2022-03-25","published":"2018-03-08"},{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Auth bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0648","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2014-01-16"},{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Command injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0650","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2014-01-16"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Command injection in Cisco Secure Access Control System","id":"CVE-2018-0253","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-05-02"},{"cvss_score":9,"headline":"Privilege escalation in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0649","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2014-01-16"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Information disclosure in Cisco Secure Access Control System","id":"CVE-2017-3841","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-02-22"},{"cvss_score":6.8,"headline":"Cross-site request forgery in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-3424","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2013-07-12"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote authenticated users can bypass RBAC checks to download support bundles and access sensitive user database information.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-6695/"}