# CVE-2013-6924: Command injection in n/a

> Remote attackers can execute arbitrary commands on Seagate BlackArmor NAS devices via shell metacharacters in the ip parameter.

- **Severity:** Critical 9.8 (`CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Not needed
- **Attackable:** Over the internet
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** No
- **Published:** 11 Oct 2017
- **Updated:** 6 Aug 2024
- **Also known as:** GHSA-j67w-9hg4-qmh3

## What is CVE-2013-6924?

CVE-2013-6924 is a critical command injection vulnerability in n/a, published on 11 Oct 2017. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

Seagate BlackArmor NAS devices with firmware sg2000-2000.1331 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the ip parameter to backupmgt/getAlias.php.

Weakness: CWE-77 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command)

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2013-6924?

It affects 1 product.


Products: Seagate Blackarmor Nas 220 Firmware.

## How do I fix CVE-2013-6924?

No fix has been published for CVE-2013-6924 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.

## Is CVE-2013-6924 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2013-6924 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Public exploit code:

- Seagate BlackArmor NAS - Privilege Escalation (exploitdb)
- Seagate BlackArmor NAS sg2000-2000.1331 - Remote Command Execution (exploitdb)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2013-6924 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2013-6924 is a critical command injection vulnerability in n/a, published on 11 Oct 2017. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2013-6924 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-6924/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-6924/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-6924
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-6924
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2013-6924

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-6924/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
