{"answers":{"affected":"2 open source packages ship an affected version, including org.neo4j:neo4j. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2013-7259 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade org.neo4j:neo4j to 2.2.0-M01 or later.","what":"CVE-2013-7259 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 29 Apr 2014. An attacker needs administrator access to exploit it, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2013-7259 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2013-7259 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 29 Apr 2014. An attacker needs administrator access to exploit it, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2013-7259 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- org.neo4j:neo4j (Maven): affected all versions; fixed in 2.2.0-M01\n- org.neo4j:neo4j (Maven): affected all versions; fixed in 2.2.0-M01\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-7259/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-7259/index.md)","id":"CVE-2013-7259","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-7259/index.md","name":"CVE-2013-7259","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-x626-q4v7-7xc6"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["code_execution","privilege_escalation"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Neo4j graph database","requires_auth":"high_privilege","summary":"CSRF vulnerabilities in Neo4j allow attackers to hijack admin sessions and execute arbitrary code via crafted requests.","user_interaction":"required","vuln_class":"csrf"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"neo4j","vendor":"neo4j"}],"cvss":{"score":6.8,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-78","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command"},{"id":"CWE-352","name":"Cross-Site Request Forgery"}],"description":"Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Neo4J 1.9.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated by a request to (1) db/data/ext/GremlinPlugin/graphdb/execute_script or (2) db/manage/server/console/.","ecosystems":["Maven"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Neo4J vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery","id":"CVE-2013-7259","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"Maven","product":null,"products":[],"type":"csrf","year":"2013"},"n_packages":2,"n_references":4,"next":{"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-7260"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"Maven","fixed":["2.2.0-M01"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"org.neo4j:neo4j","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-x626-q4v7-7xc6"},{"ecosystem":"Maven","fixed":["2.2.0-M01"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"org.neo4j:neo4j","purl":"pkg:maven/org.neo4j/neo4j","source":"GHSA-x626-q4v7-7xc6"}],"prev":{"headline":"Cross-site scripting in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-7258"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2014-04-29","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Deserialization of Untrusted Data in Neo4j","id":"CVE-2021-34371","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-08-05"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Incorrect access control in Neo4j Enterprise Database Server via LDAP authentication","id":"CVE-2018-18389","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-10-16"},{"cvss_score":6.5,"headline":"Neo4j Cypher component mishandles IMMUTABLE privileges","id":"CVE-2024-34517","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-05-07"},{"cvss_score":5.5,"headline":"Unathenticated connection can hold Bolt channel open","id":"CVE-2026-14587","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-08-05"},{"cvss_score":2.1,"headline":"Caching of authentication context","id":"CVE-2026-1471","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-03-11"},{"cvss_score":2.1,"headline":"Auth misconfiguration when multiple providers enabled","id":"CVE-2026-1524","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-03-11"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"CSRF vulnerabilities in Neo4j allow attackers to hijack admin sessions and execute arbitrary code via crafted requests.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-7259/"}