{"answers":{"affected":"7 open source packages ship an affected version, including django and Django. It affects 2 products.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2014-0480 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade django to a fixed version for your release line: 1.4.14, 1.5.9 or 1.6.6.","what":"CVE-2014-0480 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Djangoproject Django, published on 26 Aug 2014. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2014-0480 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2014-0480 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Djangoproject Django, published on 26 Aug 2014. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2014-0480 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- django (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 1.4.14, 1.5.9, 1.6.6\n- django (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 1.4.14\n- django (PyPI): affected from 1.5; fixed in 1.5.9\n- django (PyPI): affected from 1.6; fixed in 1.6.6\n- Django (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 1.4.14\n- Django (PyPI): affected from 1.5; fixed in 1.5.9\n- Django (PyPI): affected from 1.6; fixed in 1.6.6\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-0480/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-0480/index.md)","id":"CVE-2014-0480","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-0480/index.md","name":"CVE-2014-0480","record":{"aliases":["DEBIAN-CVE-2014-0480","GHSA-f7cm-ccfp-3q4r","PYSEC-2014-4","UBUNTU-CVE-2014-0480"],"analysis":{"component_type":"library","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Python web framework","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Attackers can generate scheme-relative URLs to facilitate phishing attacks by exploiting improper URL validation in the reverse function.","user_interaction":"required","vuln_class":"open_redirect"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"debian","cpe":[{"product":"django","vendor":"djangoproject"},{"product":"opensuse","vendor":"opensuse"}],"cvss":{"score":5.8,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-20","name":"Improper Input Validation"}],"description":"The core.urlresolvers.reverse function in Django before 1.4.14, 1.5.x before 1.5.9, 1.6.x before 1.6.6, and 1.7 before release candidate 3 does not properly validate URLs, which allows remote attackers to conduct phishing attacks via a // (slash slash) in a URL, which triggers a scheme-relative URL to be generated.","ecosystems":["PyPI"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Django Incorrectly Validates URLs","id":"CVE-2014-0480","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"PyPI","product":"djangoproject:django","products":["djangoproject:django","opensuse:opensuse"],"type":"open_redirect","year":"2014"},"n_packages":7,"n_references":7,"next":{"headline":"Django denial of service via file upload naming","id":"CVE-2014-0481"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["1.4.14"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"Django","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-f7cm-ccfp-3q4r"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["1.5.9"],"introduced":["1.5"],"last_affected":[],"package":"Django","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-f7cm-ccfp-3q4r"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["1.6.6"],"introduced":["1.6"],"last_affected":[],"package":"Django","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-f7cm-ccfp-3q4r"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["1.4.14","1.5.9","1.6.6"],"introduced":["0","1.5","1.6"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:pypi/django","source":"PYSEC-2014-4"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["1.4.14"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:pypi/django","source":"GHSA-f7cm-ccfp-3q4r"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["1.5.9"],"introduced":["1.5"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:pypi/django","source":"GHSA-f7cm-ccfp-3q4r"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["1.6.6"],"introduced":["1.6"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:pypi/django","source":"GHSA-f7cm-ccfp-3q4r"}],"prev":{"headline":"Command injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0479"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2014-08-26","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Privilege abuse in GenericInlineModelAdmin","id":"CVE-2026-4277","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-04-07"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django SQL injection in HasKey(lhs, rhs) on Oracle","id":"CVE-2024-53908","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-12-06"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django SQL injection vulnerability","id":"CVE-2024-42005","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-08-07"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django bypasses validation when using one form field to upload multiple files","id":"CVE-2023-31047","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-05-07"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django `Trunc()` and `Extract()` database functions vulnerable to SQL Injection","id":"CVE-2022-34265","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-07-04"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"SQL Injection in Django","id":"CVE-2021-35042","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-07-02"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"SQL injection in Django","id":"CVE-2020-7471","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-02-03"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"PyPA Advisory Database","prefix":"PYSEC"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Attackers can generate scheme-relative URLs to facilitate phishing attacks by exploiting improper URL validation in the reverse function.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-0480/"}