{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2014-0675 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2014-0675 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2014-0675 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 23 Jan 2014. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2014-0675 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2014-0675 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 23 Jan 2014. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2014-0675 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-0675/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-0675/index.md)","id":"CVE-2014-0675","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-0675/index.md","name":"CVE-2014-0675","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-8226-xx72-qrh6"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Cisco TelePresence VCS","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Remote attackers can intercept SSL sessions via man-in-the-middle attacks due to shared default X.509 certificates in Cisco TelePresence VCS.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"weak_cryptography"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"cisco","cpe":[{"product":"telepresence_video_communication_server","vendor":"cisco"}],"cvss":{"score":6.4,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-255","name":null}],"description":"The Expressway component in Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) uses the same default X.509 certificate across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks against SSL sessions by leveraging the certificate's trust relationship, aka Bug ID CSCue07471.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Weak cryptography in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0675","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"weak_cryptography","year":"2014"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":7,"next":{"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0676"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Auth bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0674"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2014-01-23","related":[{"cvss_score":9.6,"headline":"Privilege escalation in Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) Expressway","id":"CVE-2023-20105","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-06-28"},{"cvss_score":9.6,"headline":"Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server Privilege Escalation Vulnerabilities","id":"CVE-2023-20192","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-06-28"},{"cvss_score":9,"headline":"Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server Vulnerabilities","id":"CVE-2022-20754","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-04-06"},{"cvss_score":9,"headline":"Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server Vulnerabilities","id":"CVE-2022-20755","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-04-06"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Command injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-1468","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-08-08"},{"cvss_score":8.6,"headline":"Denial of service in Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS)","id":"CVE-2019-1845","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2019-06-05"},{"cvss_score":7.7,"headline":"Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server Denial of Service Vulnerability","id":"CVE-2019-1721","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2019-04-18"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote attackers can intercept SSL sessions via man-in-the-middle attacks due to shared default X.509 certificates in Cisco TelePresence VCS.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-0675/"}