{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 2 products.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2014-0865 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2014-0865 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2014-0865 is a medium-severity unsafe deserialization vulnerability in n/a, published on 7 Jul 2014. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2014-0865 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2014-0865 is a medium-severity unsafe deserialization vulnerability in n/a, published on 7 Jul 2014. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2014-0865 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-0865/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-0865/index.md)","id":"CVE-2014-0865","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-0865/index.md","name":"CVE-2014-0865","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-24qp-pvw9-442x"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["data_modify","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"IBM Algo Credit Limits","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Authenticated attackers can bypass dual-control restrictions and modify data by sending crafted serialized objects to IBM Algo Credit Limits.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"deserialization"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"ibm","cpe":[{"product":"algo_credit_limits","vendor":"ibm"},{"product":"algorithmics","vendor":"ibm"}],"cvss":{"score":4.9,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:P","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-20","name":"Improper Input Validation"}],"description":"RICOS in IBM Algo Credit Limits (aka ACLM) 4.5.0 through 4.7.0 before 4.7.0.03 FP5 in IBM Algorithmics relies on client-side input validation, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended dual-control restrictions and modify data via crafted serialized objects, as demonstrated by limit manipulations.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":1,"first_seen":"2014-07-01","github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[{"date":"2014-07-01","kind":"exploitdb","ref":"33942","stars":null,"title":"IBM Algorithmics RICOS 4.5.0 \u003c 4.7.0 - Multiple Vulnerabilities"}],"tier":"poc_unverified"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Deserialization in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0865","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"deserialization","year":"2014"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":7,"next":{"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0866"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Cross-site request forgery in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0864"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2014-07-07","related":[{"cvss_score":6.8,"headline":"Cross-site request forgery in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0864","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2014-07-07"},{"cvss_score":5.8,"headline":"Other in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0867","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2014-07-07"},{"cvss_score":4.9,"headline":"Business logic in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0868","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2014-07-07"},{"cvss_score":4.3,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0866","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2014-07-07"},{"cvss_score":4.3,"headline":"Weak cryptography in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0869","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2014-07-07"},{"cvss_score":4.3,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0870","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2014-07-07"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"GPL-2.0-or-later","name":"Exploit-DB"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Authenticated attackers can bypass dual-control restrictions and modify data by sending crafted serialized objects to IBM Algo Credit Limits.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-0865/"}