{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2014-0905 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2014-0905 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2014-0905 is a low-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 17 Aug 2014. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2014-0905 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2014-0905 is a low-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 17 Aug 2014. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2014-0905 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-0905/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-0905/index.md)","id":"CVE-2014-0905","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-0905/index.md","name":"CVE-2014-0905","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-7f3j-g2c7-pj76"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["account_takeover","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Big Data Analytics Platform","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Attackers can intercept LTPA cookies in HTTPS sessions due to missing secure flags, potentially leading to session hijacking and unauthorized access.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"security_feature_bypass"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"ibm","cpe":[{"product":"infosphere_biginsights","vendor":"ibm"}],"cvss":{"score":2.9,"severity":"low","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-264","name":null}],"description":"IBM InfoSphere BigInsights 2.0 through 2.1.2 does not set the secure flag for the LTPA cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission within an http session.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0905","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"security_feature_bypass","year":"2014"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":2,"next":{"headline":"Auth bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0906"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Code injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-0904"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2014-08-17","related":[{"cvss_score":6.5,"headline":"IBM InfoSphere BigInsights Invalid Input","id":"CVE-2013-3993","kev_date_added":"2022-05-25","published":"2014-07-07"},{"cvss_score":7.4,"headline":"Privilege escalation in n/a","id":"CVE-2015-1947","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2015-12-31"},{"cvss_score":6.5,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-4782","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-04-20"},{"cvss_score":6.5,"headline":"Missing authorization in n/a","id":"CVE-2015-1889","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2015-04-22"},{"cvss_score":6,"headline":"Cross-site request forgery in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-3992","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2013-08-05"},{"cvss_score":5.4,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in BigInsights","id":"CVE-2017-1552","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-11-01"},{"cvss_score":5.4,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in BigInsights","id":"CVE-2017-1553","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-11-01"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Attackers can intercept LTPA cookies in HTTPS sessions due to missing secure flags, potentially leading to session hijacking and unauthorized access.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-0905/"}