{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2014-2734 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2014-2734 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2014-2734 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Ruby-Lang Ruby, published on 24 Apr 2014. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2014-2734 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2014-2734 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Ruby-Lang Ruby, published on 24 Apr 2014. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2014-2734 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Ruby-Lang Ruby. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-2734/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-2734/index.md)","id":"CVE-2014-2734","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-2734/index.md","name":"CVE-2014-2734","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-6qq6-x75v-fgg7"],"analysis":{"component_type":"library","fix_type":"no_fix_stated","impacts":["security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Ruby OpenSSL extension","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Remote attackers could potentially spoof signatures in Ruby scripts due to improper memory state handling, though the vulnerability is disputed.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"other"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"ruby","vendor":"ruby-lang"}],"cvss":{"score":5.8,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-399","name":null}],"description":"The openssl extension in Ruby 2.x does not properly maintain the state of process memory after a file is reopened, which allows remote attackers to spoof signatures within the context of a Ruby script that attempts signature verification after performing a certain sequence of filesystem operations.  NOTE: this issue has been disputed by the Ruby OpenSSL team and third parties, who state that the original demonstration PoC contains errors and redundant or unnecessarily-complex code that does not appear to be related to a demonstration of the issue. As of 20140502, CVE is not aware of any public comment by the original researcher","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":"2014-04-16","github_poc":2,"max_poc_stars":1,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[{"date":"2014-04-17T06:51:01Z","kind":"github_poc","ref":"https://github.com/adrienthebo/cve-2014-2734","stars":1,"title":"I think this CVE is full of lies and deceit and very confusing code."},{"date":"2014-04-16T18:38:12Z","kind":"github_poc","ref":"https://github.com/gdisneyleugers/CVE-2014-2734","stars":0,"title":"Ruby OpenSSL CA Private Key Spoofing"}],"tier":"poc_unverified"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Other in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-2734","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":"ruby-lang:ruby","products":["ruby-lang:ruby"],"type":"other","year":"2014"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":10,"next":{"headline":"Security feature bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-2735"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2014-2733"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2014-04-24","related":[{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2009-4124","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2009-12-11"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Use after free in n/a","id":"CVE-2022-28738","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-05-09"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Weak cryptography in OpenSSL extension of Ruby (Git trunk)","id":"CVE-2011-4121","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2019-11-26"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Command injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2017-17790","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-12-20"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2017-11465","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-07-19"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Memory corruption in Ruby","id":"CVE-2016-2336","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-01-06"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Code injection in Ruby","id":"CVE-2016-2337","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-01-06"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"},{"class":"open","licence":"CC0","name":"PoC-in-GitHub"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote attackers could potentially spoof signatures in Ruby scripts due to improper memory state handling, though the vulnerability is disputed.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2014-2734/"}