{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 3 products.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2015-1867 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade to a fixed version.","what":"CVE-2015-1867 is a high-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 12 Aug 2015. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2015-1867 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2015-1867 is a high-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 12 Aug 2015. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2015-1867 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2015-1867/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2015-1867/index.md)","id":"CVE-2015-1867","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2015-1867/index.md","name":"CVE-2015-1867","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-95mv-cmj7-gfh7","RHSA-2015:1424","RHSA-2015:2383"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["privilege_escalation"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Pacemaker cluster manager","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Remote read-only users can escalate privileges in Pacemaker via an ACL command due to improper node evaluation.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"privilege_escalation"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"redhat","cpe":[{"product":"pacemaker","vendor":"clusterlabs"},{"product":"enterprise_linux_high_availability","vendor":"redhat"},{"product":"enterprise_linux_resilient_storage","vendor":"redhat"}],"cvss":{"score":7.5,"severity":"high","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-264","name":null}],"description":"Pacemaker before 1.1.13 does not properly evaluate added nodes, which allows remote read-only users to gain privileges via an acl command.","ecosystems":["Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::server","Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Privilege escalation in n/a","id":"CVE-2015-1867","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"privilege_escalation","year":"2015"},"n_packages":19,"n_references":9,"next":{"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2015-1868"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::server","fixed":["0:1.1.12-8.el6"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker","source":"RHSA-2015:1424"},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::server","fixed":["0:1.1.12-8.el6"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker-cli","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker-cli","source":"RHSA-2015:1424"},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::server","fixed":["0:1.1.12-8.el6"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker-cluster-libs","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker-cluster-libs","source":"RHSA-2015:1424"},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::server","fixed":["0:1.1.12-8.el6"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker-cts","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker-cts","source":"RHSA-2015:1424"},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::server","fixed":["0:1.1.12-8.el6"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker-debuginfo","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker-debuginfo","source":"RHSA-2015:1424"},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::server","fixed":["0:1.1.12-8.el6"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker-doc","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker-doc","source":"RHSA-2015:1424"},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::server","fixed":["0:1.1.12-8.el6"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker-libs","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker-libs","source":"RHSA-2015:1424"},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::server","fixed":["0:1.1.12-8.el6"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker-libs-devel","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker-libs-devel","source":"RHSA-2015:1424"},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::server","fixed":["0:1.1.12-8.el6"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker-remote","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker-remote","source":"RHSA-2015:1424"},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server","fixed":["0:1.1.13-10.el7"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker","source":"RHSA-2015:2383"},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server","fixed":["0:1.1.13-10.el7"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker-cli","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker-cli","source":"RHSA-2015:2383"},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server","fixed":["0:1.1.13-10.el7"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker-cluster-libs","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker-cluster-libs","source":"RHSA-2015:2383"},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server","fixed":["0:1.1.13-10.el7"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker-cts","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker-cts","source":"RHSA-2015:2383"},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server","fixed":["0:1.1.13-10.el7"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker-debuginfo","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker-debuginfo","source":"RHSA-2015:2383"},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server","fixed":["0:1.1.13-10.el7"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker-doc","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker-doc","source":"RHSA-2015:2383"},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server","fixed":["0:1.1.13-10.el7"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker-libs","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker-libs","source":"RHSA-2015:2383"},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server","fixed":["0:1.1.13-10.el7"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker-libs-devel","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker-libs-devel","source":"RHSA-2015:2383"},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server","fixed":["0:1.1.13-10.el7"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker-nagios-plugins-metadata","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker-nagios-plugins-metadata","source":"RHSA-2015:2383"},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server","fixed":["0:1.1.13-10.el7"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacemaker-remote","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/pacemaker-remote","source":"RHSA-2015:2383"}],"prev":{"headline":"ember-source vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting","id":"CVE-2015-1866"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2015-08-12","related":[{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Missing authorization in pacemaker","id":"CVE-2016-7035","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-09-10"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-7797","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-03-24"},{"cvss_score":7.2,"headline":"Auth bypass in pacemaker","id":"CVE-2020-25654","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-11-24"},{"cvss_score":5.5,"headline":"Path traversal in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-5271","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2019-11-12"},{"cvss_score":4.3,"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-0281","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2013-11-23"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"Red Hat","prefix":"RHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote read-only users can escalate privileges in Pacemaker via an ACL command due to improper node evaluation.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2015-1867/"}