{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2015-2025 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2015-2025 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2015-2025 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 4 Oct 2015. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2015-2025 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2015-2025 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 4 Oct 2015. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2015-2025 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2015-2025/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2015-2025/index.md)","id":"CVE-2015-2025","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2015-2025/index.md","name":"CVE-2015-2025","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-x4vf-q922-8w98"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["data_read","account_takeover"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"IBM WebSphere eXtreme Scale","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Remote attackers can intercept session cookies due to missing secure flags, potentially leading to session hijacking and unauthorized access.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"information_disclosure"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"ibm","cpe":[{"product":"websphere_extreme_scale","vendor":"ibm"}],"cvss":{"score":4.3,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N","version":"2.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-200","name":"Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor"}],"description":"IBM WebSphere eXtreme Scale 7.1.0 before 7.1.0.3 and 7.1.1 before 7.1.1.1 does not set the secure flag for the session cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission within an http session.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2015-2025","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"information_disclosure","year":"2015"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":3,"next":{"headline":"Cross-site request forgery in n/a","id":"CVE-2015-2026"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2015-2023"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2015-10-04","related":[{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"IBM WebSphere eXtreme Scale is affected by Insecure Deserilization","id":"CVE-2026-13759","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-06-30"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"IBM WebSphere eXtreme Scale's OQL is affected by remote code execution","id":"CVE-2026-13772","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-06-30"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Auth bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-5393","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2013-10-16"},{"cvss_score":6.5,"headline":"IBM WebSphere eXtremes Scale is affected by uncontrolled resource consumption when XDF is enabled","id":"CVE-2026-9002","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-06-30"},{"cvss_score":6.1,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in WebSphere eXtreme Scale","id":"CVE-2019-4109","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2019-09-30"},{"cvss_score":6.1,"headline":"Other in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-0400","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-07-02"},{"cvss_score":6,"headline":"IBM WebSphere eXtreme Scale is affected by server side request forgery when ORB is used as Transport Protocol","id":"CVE-2026-13773","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-06-30"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote attackers can intercept session cookies due to missing secure flags, potentially leading to session hijacking and unauthorized access.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2015-2025/"}