{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 4 products.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2016-0702 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade to a fixed version.","what":"CVE-2016-0702 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Canonical Ubuntu Linux, published on 3 Mar 2016. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2016-0702 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2016-0702 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Canonical Ubuntu Linux, published on 3 Mar 2016. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2016-0702 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Canonical Ubuntu Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-0702/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-0702/index.md)","id":"CVE-2016-0702","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-0702/index.md","name":"CVE-2016-0702","record":{"aliases":["DEBIAN-CVE-2016-0702","GHSA-q7xg-gmg7-59f4","UBUNTU-CVE-2016-0702"],"analysis":{"component_type":"library","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["data_read"],"network_reachable":"adjacent_or_local","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"OpenSSL cryptographic library","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Local attackers can recover RSA private keys by exploiting cache timing side-channels during modular exponentiation on Intel Sandy Bridge CPUs.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"information_disclosure"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"redhat","cpe":[{"product":"ubuntu_linux","vendor":"canonical"},{"product":"debian_linux","vendor":"debian"},{"product":"node.js","vendor":"nodejs"},{"product":"openssl","vendor":"openssl"}],"cvss":{"score":5.1,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-200","name":"Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor"}],"description":"The MOD_EXP_CTIME_COPY_FROM_PREBUF function in crypto/bn/bn_exp.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g does not properly consider cache-bank access times during modular exponentiation, which makes it easier for local users to discover RSA keys by running a crafted application on the same Intel Sandy Bridge CPU core as a victim and leveraging cache-bank conflicts, aka a \"CacheBleed\" attack.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":"2023-11-09","github_poc":1,"max_poc_stars":0,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[{"date":"2023-11-09T13:10:12Z","kind":"github_poc","ref":"https://github.com/Trinadh465/OpenSSL-1_0_1g_CVE-2016-0702","stars":0,"title":null}],"tier":"poc_unverified"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-0702","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":"canonical:ubuntu_linux","products":["canonical:ubuntu_linux","debian:debian_linux","nodejs:node.js","openssl:openssl"],"type":"information_disclosure","year":"2016"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":44,"next":{"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-0703"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Weak cryptography in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-0701"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2016-03-03","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"SaltStack Salt Authentication Bypass","id":"CVE-2020-11651","kev_date_added":"2021-11-03","published":"2020-04-30"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"OpenSMTPD Remote Code Execution","id":"CVE-2020-7247","kev_date_added":"2022-03-25","published":"2020-01-29"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Exim Out-of-bounds Write","id":"CVE-2019-16928","kev_date_added":"2022-03-03","published":"2019-09-27"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Exim Buffer Overflow","id":"CVE-2018-6789","kev_date_added":"2021-11-03","published":"2018-02-08"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Oracle Java SE and Java SE Embedded Remote Code Execution","id":"CVE-2015-2590","kev_date_added":"2022-03-03","published":"2015-07-16"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Oracle JRE Remote Code Execution","id":"CVE-2013-0422","kev_date_added":"2022-05-25","published":"2013-01-10"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Oracle Java SE Runtime Environment (JRE) Arbitrary Code Execution","id":"CVE-2011-3544","kev_date_added":"2022-03-03","published":"2011-10-19"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"},{"class":"open","licence":"CC0","name":"PoC-in-GitHub"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-05","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Local attackers can recover RSA private keys by exploiting cache timing side-channels during modular exponentiation on Intel Sandy Bridge CPUs.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-0702/"}