{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2016-2922 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2016-2922 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2016-2922 is a low-severity vulnerability in IBM Rational ClearQuest, published on 13 Aug 2018. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2016-2922 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2016-2922 is a low-severity vulnerability in IBM Rational ClearQuest, published on 13 Aug 2018. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2016-2922 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: IBM Rational ClearQuest. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-2922/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-2922/index.md)","id":"CVE-2016-2922","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-2922/index.md","name":"CVE-2016-2922","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-jm2m-hh98-h83r"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["data_read","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"IBM Rational ClearQuest","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Man-in-the-middle attackers can intercept data in IBM Rational ClearQuest due to missing SSL hostname verification.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"security_feature_bypass"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"ibm","cpe":[{"product":"rational_clearquest","vendor":"ibm"}],"cvss":{"score":3.7,"severity":"low","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:3.0/A:N/AC:H/AV:N/C:L/I:N/PR:N/S:U/UI:N/E:U/RC:C/RL:O","version":"3.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-295","name":"Improper Certificate Validation"}],"description":"IBM Rational ClearQuest 8.0 through 8.0.1.9 and 9.0 through 9.0.1.3 (CQ OSLC linkages, EmailRelay) fails to check the SSL certificate against the requested hostname. It is subject to a man-in-the-middle attack with an impersonating server observing all the data transmitted to the real server. IBM X-Force ID: 113353.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Security feature bypass in Rational ClearQuest","id":"CVE-2016-2922","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"security_feature_bypass","year":"2016"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":2,"next":{"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-2923"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-2917"},"products":["Rational ClearQuest"],"published":"2018-08-13","related":[{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Other in n/a","id":"CVE-2010-4601","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2010-12-29"},{"cvss_score":9.3,"headline":"Memory corruption in n/a","id":"CVE-2012-0708","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2012-04-22"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"SQL injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2011-1390","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2012-05-14"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in IBM Rational ClearQuest before 7.1.1.02 have unknown impact and attack vectors, as demonstrated by an AppScan report.","id":"CVE-2010-2517","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2010-06-30"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Missing authorization in n/a","id":"CVE-2008-5329","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2008-12-05"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Other in n/a","id":"CVE-2007-5090","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2007-09-26"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"SQL injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2007-4368","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2007-08-15"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-09-16","vendors":["IBM"]},"summary":"Man-in-the-middle attackers can intercept data in IBM Rational ClearQuest due to missing SSL hostname verification.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-2922/"}