{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2016-2929 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2016-2929 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2016-2929 is a high-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 25 Nov 2016. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2016-2929 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2016-2929 is a high-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 25 Nov 2016. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2016-2929 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-2929/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-2929/index.md)","id":"CVE-2016-2929","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-2929/index.md","name":"CVE-2016-2929","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-jjpr-8mcq-wxg3"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["account_takeover"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"IBM BigFix Remote Control","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Weak password restrictions in IBM BigFix Remote Control allow remote attackers to gain access via brute-force attacks.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"weak_cryptography"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"ibm","cpe":[{"product":"bigfix_remote_control","vendor":"ibm"}],"cvss":{"score":8.1,"severity":"high","source":"nvd","vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","version":"3.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-284","name":"Improper Access Control"},{"id":"CWE-254","name":null}],"description":"IBM BigFix Remote Control before 9.1.3 does not properly restrict password choices, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via a brute-force approach.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Weak cryptography in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-2929","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"weak_cryptography","year":"2016"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":3,"next":{"headline":"Auth bypass in BigFix Remote Control","id":"CVE-2016-2930"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-2928"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2016-11-25","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Auth bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-2944","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-11-30"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Cross-site request forgery in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-2963","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-11-30"},{"cvss_score":7.8,"headline":"Hardcoded credentials in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-2948","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-11-30"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Auth bypass in BigFix Remote Control","id":"CVE-2016-2930","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-05-03"},{"cvss_score":7.3,"headline":"Hardcoded credentials in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-2936","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-11-30"},{"cvss_score":6.8,"headline":"Path traversal in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-2933","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-11-30"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-05","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Weak password restrictions in IBM BigFix Remote Control allow remote attackers to gain access via brute-force attacks.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-2929/"}