{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2016-2948 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2016-2948 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2016-2948 is a high-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 30 Nov 2016. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2016-2948 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2016-2948 is a high-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 30 Nov 2016. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2016-2948 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-2948/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-2948/index.md)","id":"CVE-2016-2948","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-2948/index.md","name":"CVE-2016-2948","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-x32f-4vmq-gfgv"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["data_read","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"adjacent_or_local","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"IBM BigFix Remote Control","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Local attackers can discover hardcoded credentials in IBM BigFix Remote Control, potentially leading to unauthorized access or data exposure.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"hardcoded_credentials"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"ibm","cpe":[{"product":"bigfix_remote_control","vendor":"ibm"}],"cvss":{"score":7.8,"severity":"high","source":"nvd","vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","version":"3.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-798","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"}],"description":"IBM BigFix Remote Control before 9.1.3 allows local users to discover hardcoded credentials via unspecified vectors.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Hardcoded credentials in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-2948","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"hardcoded_credentials","year":"2016"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":3,"next":{"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-2949"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-2947"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2016-11-30","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Auth bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-2944","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-11-30"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Cross-site request forgery in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-2963","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-11-30"},{"cvss_score":8.1,"headline":"Weak cryptography in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-2929","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-11-25"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Auth bypass in BigFix Remote Control","id":"CVE-2016-2930","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-05-03"},{"cvss_score":7.3,"headline":"Hardcoded credentials in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-2936","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-11-30"},{"cvss_score":6.8,"headline":"Path traversal in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-2933","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-11-30"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-05","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Local attackers can discover hardcoded credentials in IBM BigFix Remote Control, potentially leading to unauthorized access or data exposure.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-2948/"}