{"answers":{"affected":"2 open source packages ship an affected version, including froxlor/froxlor. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2016-5100 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade froxlor/froxlor to 0.9.35 or later.","what":"CVE-2016-5100 is a critical vulnerability in n/a, published on 13 Feb 2017. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2016-5100 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2016-5100 is a critical vulnerability in n/a, published on 13 Feb 2017. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2016-5100 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- froxlor/froxlor (Packagist): affected all versions; fixed in 0.9.35\n- froxlor/froxlor (Packagist): affected all versions; fixed in 0.9.35\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-5100/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-5100/index.md)","id":"CVE-2016-5100","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-5100/index.md","name":"CVE-2016-5100","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-qj6h-m7xc-r2v3","openSUSE-SU-2021:0415-1","openSUSE-SU-2021:0450-1"],"analysis":{"component_type":"web_application","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["account_takeover"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Froxlor hosting panel","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Remote attackers can predict password reset tokens due to weak random number generation, potentially leading to account takeover.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"weak_cryptography"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"froxlor","vendor":"froxlor"}],"cvss":{"score":9.8,"severity":"critical","source":"nvd","vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","version":"3.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-330","name":"Use of Insufficiently Random Values"}],"description":"Froxlor before 0.9.35 uses the PHP rand function for random number generation, which makes it easier for remote attackers to guess the password reset token by predicting a value.","ecosystems":["Packagist","SUSE:Package Hub 15 SP2","openSUSE:Leap 15.2"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Froxlor guessable password reset token","id":"CVE-2016-5100","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"Packagist","product":null,"products":[],"type":"weak_cryptography","year":"2016"},"n_packages":4,"n_references":1,"next":{"headline":"Code injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-5101"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"Packagist","fixed":["0.9.35"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"froxlor/froxlor","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-qj6h-m7xc-r2v3"},{"ecosystem":"Packagist","fixed":["0.9.35"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"froxlor/froxlor","purl":"pkg:composer/froxlor/froxlor","source":"GHSA-qj6h-m7xc-r2v3"},{"ecosystem":"SUSE:Package Hub 15 SP2","fixed":["0.10.23-bp152.4.3.1"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"froxlor","purl":"pkg:rpm/suse/froxlor\u0026distro=SUSE%20Package%20Hub%2015%20SP2","source":"openSUSE-SU-2021:0450-1"},{"ecosystem":"openSUSE:Leap 15.2","fixed":["0.10.23-lp152.4.3.1"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"froxlor","purl":"pkg:rpm/opensuse/froxlor\u0026distro=openSUSE%20Leap%2015.2","source":"openSUSE-SU-2021:0415-1"}],"prev":{"headline":"Cross-site scripting in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-5099"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2017-02-13","related":[{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Froxlor has Local File Inclusion via path traversal in API `def_language` parameter that leads to Remote Code Execution","id":"CVE-2026-41228","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-04-23"},{"cvss_score":9.9,"headline":"Improper Link Resolution Before File Access in froxlor/froxlor","id":"CVE-2023-6069","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-11-10"},{"cvss_score":9.9,"headline":"Code Injection in froxlor/froxlor","id":"CVE-2023-0671","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-02-04"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts in froxlor/froxlor","id":"CVE-2023-3173","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-06-09"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness in froxlor/froxlor","id":"CVE-2023-1307","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-03-10"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Froxlor SQL injection vulnerability","id":"CVE-2021-42325","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-10-12"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2015-5959","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-09-06"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"SUSE","prefix":"openSUSE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote attackers can predict password reset tokens due to weak random number generation, potentially leading to account takeover.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-5100/"}