{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2016-5968 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2016-5968 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2016-5968 is a medium-severity server-side request forgery vulnerability in n/a, published on 25 Nov 2016. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2016-5968 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2016-5968 is a medium-severity server-side request forgery vulnerability in n/a, published on 25 Nov 2016. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2016-5968 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-5968/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-5968/index.md)","id":"CVE-2016-5968","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-5968/index.md","name":"CVE-2016-5968","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-328r-gg4v-8wh6"],"analysis":{"component_type":"web_application","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["data_read","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"IBM Tealeaf Customer Experience","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Remote attackers can exploit the Replay Server to conduct Server-Side Request Forgery attacks, potentially accessing internal resources.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"ssrf"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"ibm","cpe":[{"product":"tealeaf_customer_experience","vendor":"ibm"}],"cvss":{"score":5.3,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","version":"3.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-918","name":"Server-Side Request Forgery"}],"description":"The Replay Server in IBM Tealeaf Customer Experience 8.x before 8.7.1.8847 FP10, 8.8.x before 8.8.0.9049 FP9, 9.0.0 and 9.0.1 before 9.0.1.1117 FP5, 9.0.1A before 9.0.1.5108 FP5, 9.0.2 before 9.0.2.1223 FP3, and 9.0.2A before 9.0.2.5224 FP3 allows remote attackers to conduct SSRF attacks via unspecified vectors.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Server-side request forgery in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-5968","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"ssrf","year":"2016"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":2,"next":{"headline":"Path traversal in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-5970"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-5967"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2016-11-25","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Hardcoded credentials in Tealeaf Customer Experience","id":"CVE-2017-1204","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-01-26"},{"cvss_score":8.6,"headline":"Path traversal in n/a","id":"CVE-2015-4988","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-01-18"},{"cvss_score":8.1,"headline":"Information disclosure in Tealeaf Customer Experience","id":"CVE-2016-2983","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-01-26"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Weak cryptography in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-5996","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-09-26"},{"cvss_score":6.8,"headline":"Open redirect in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-5977","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-09-26"},{"cvss_score":6.5,"headline":"Auth bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2015-4987","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-03-27"},{"cvss_score":6.5,"headline":"Path traversal in Tealeaf Customer Experience","id":"CVE-2017-1279","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-01-26"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote attackers can exploit the Replay Server to conduct Server-Side Request Forgery attacks, potentially accessing internal resources.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-5968/"}