{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2016-6344 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2016-6344 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2016-6344 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 7 Sep 2016. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2016-6344 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2016-6344 is a medium-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 7 Sep 2016. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2016-6344 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-6344/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-6344/index.md)","id":"CVE-2016-6344","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-6344/index.md","name":"CVE-2016-6344","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-jhjx-rgjj-x5xp"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["data_read"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"JBoss BPM Suite","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Remote attackers can steal session cookies via script access because the HTTPOnly flag is missing, exposing sensitive user information.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"information_disclosure"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"redhat","cpe":[{"product":"jboss_bpm_suite","vendor":"redhat"}],"cvss":{"score":5.3,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","version":"3.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-200","name":"Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor"}],"description":"Red Hat JBoss BPM Suite 6.3.x does not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header for session cookies, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information via script access to the cookies.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-6344","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"information_disclosure","year":"2016"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":4,"next":{"headline":"Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in RESTEasy","id":"CVE-2016-6345"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Cross-site scripting in Dashbuilder","id":"CVE-2016-6343"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2016-09-07","related":[{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Cross-site request forgery in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-5401","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-04-20"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Cross-site request forgery in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-7034","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-09-07"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"XML external entity in n/a","id":"CVE-2015-1818","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2015-08-11"},{"cvss_score":6.5,"headline":"Code injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2013-6468","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2014-04-10"},{"cvss_score":6.1,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in Dashbuilder","id":"CVE-2016-6343","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-10-31"},{"cvss_score":6.1,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in business-central","id":"CVE-2017-2674","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-07-27"},{"cvss_score":6.1,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in business-central","id":"CVE-2017-7463","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-07-27"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote attackers can steal session cookies via script access because the HTTPOnly flag is missing, exposing sensitive user information.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-6344/"}