{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2016-7077 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade to a fixed version.","what":"CVE-2016-7077 is a medium-severity missing authorization vulnerability in Theforeman Foreman, published on 10 Sep 2018. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2016-7077 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2016-7077 is a medium-severity missing authorization vulnerability in Theforeman Foreman, published on 10 Sep 2018. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2016-7077 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Theforeman Foreman. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-7077/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-7077/index.md)","id":"CVE-2016-7077","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-7077/index.md","name":"CVE-2016-7077","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-qw4f-j9p2-3626"],"analysis":{"component_type":"web_application","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["data_read"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Foreman IT management","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Unauthorized users can view names of associated objects in Foreman due to missing authorization checks in form helpers.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"missing_authorization"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"redhat","cpe":[{"product":"foreman","vendor":"theforeman"}],"cvss":{"score":4.3,"severity":"medium","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","version":"3.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-200","name":"Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor"},{"id":"CWE-285","name":"Improper Authorization"}],"description":"foreman before 1.14.0 is vulnerable to an information leak. It was found that Foreman form helper does not authorize options for associated objects. Unauthorized user can see names of such objects if their count is less than 6.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Missing authorization in foreman","id":"CVE-2016-7077","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":"theforeman:foreman","products":["theforeman:foreman"],"type":"missing_authorization","year":"2016"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":4,"next":{"headline":"Missing authorization in foreman","id":"CVE-2016-7078"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Security feature bypass in sudo","id":"CVE-2016-7076"},"products":["foreman"],"published":"2018-09-10","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"smart_proxy_dynflow gem authentication bypass in Foreman remote execution feature","id":"CVE-2018-14643","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-09-21"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Missing authorization in foreman","id":"CVE-2017-7505","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-05-26"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Missing authorization in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-4475","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-08-19"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Code injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2016-3728","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-05-20"},{"cvss_score":8.1,"headline":"Auth bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2015-5246","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-10-06"},{"cvss_score":8.1,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2015-5152","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-07-14"},{"cvss_score":7.8,"headline":"Information disclosure in foreman","id":"CVE-2021-20260","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-08-26"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["Foreman"]},"summary":"Unauthorized users can view names of associated objects in Foreman due to missing authorization checks in form helpers.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-7077/"}