{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2016-8212 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2016-8212 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2016-8212 is a high-severity vulnerability in RSA BSAFE Crypto-J RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2, published on 3 Feb 2017. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2016-8212 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2016-8212 is a high-severity vulnerability in RSA BSAFE Crypto-J RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2, published on 3 Feb 2017. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2016-8212 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: RSA BSAFE Crypto-J RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-8212/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-8212/index.md)","id":"CVE-2016-8212","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-8212/index.md","name":"CVE-2016-8212","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-xm3c-w6gm-7q8v"],"analysis":{"component_type":"library","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Java crypto library","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Improper OCSP validation in RSA BSAFE Crypto-J allows attackers to bypass certificate revocation checks by omitting the nextUpdate field.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"security_feature_bypass"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"dell","cpe":[{"product":"bsafe_crypto-j","vendor":"dell"}],"cvss":{"score":7.5,"severity":"high","source":"nvd","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-404","name":"Improper Resource Shutdown or Release"}],"description":"An issue was discovered in EMC RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2. There is an Improper OCSP Validation Vulnerability. OCSP responses have two time values: thisUpdate and nextUpdate. These specify a validity period; however, both values are optional. Crypto-J treats the lack of a nextUpdate as indicating that the OCSP response is valid indefinitely instead of restricting its validity for a brief period surrounding the thisUpdate time. This vulnerability is similar to the issue described in CVE-2015-4748.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Security feature bypass in RSA BSAFE Crypto-J RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2","id":"CVE-2016-8212","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"security_feature_bypass","year":"2016"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":3,"next":{"headline":"Cross-site scripting in EMC Documentum Webtop and Clients","id":"CVE-2016-8213"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Path traversal in EMC Data Protection Advisor EMC Data Protection Advisor 6.1.x, EMC Data Protection Advisor 6.2, EMC Data Protection Advisor 6.2.1, EMC Data Protection Advisor 6.2.2, EMC Data Protection Advisor 6.2.3 prior to patch 446","id":"CVE-2016-8211"},"products":["RSA BSAFE Crypto-J RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2"],"published":"2017-02-03","related":[{"cvss_score":9.1,"headline":"Supply chain in Dell BSAFE Crypto-J","id":"CVE-2022-34381","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-02-02"},{"cvss_score":5.9,"headline":"Information disclosure in BSAFE Crypto-J","id":"CVE-2025-26333","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-09-25"},{"cvss_score":5.9,"headline":"Weak cryptography in RSA BSAFE Crypto-J","id":"CVE-2018-11070","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-09-11"},{"cvss_score":3.7,"headline":"Information disclosure in RSA BSAFE Crypto-J RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2","id":"CVE-2016-8217","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-02-03"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-06","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Improper OCSP validation in RSA BSAFE Crypto-J allows attackers to bypass certificate revocation checks by omitting the nextUpdate field.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-8212/"}